<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nevermind &#187; Crime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nevermind.co.nz/category/crime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nevermind.co.nz</link>
	<description>Epiq Failjure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 09:50:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye, Nanny State! Hello, Big Brother&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.nevermind.co.nz/2009/02/11/goodbye-nanny-state-hello-big-brother/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nevermind.co.nz/2009/02/11/goodbye-nanny-state-hello-big-brother/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nevermind.co.nz/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The governments proposed amendments to the Criminal Investigations Act are, quite simply, chilling. The police already have powers to store your DNA but under very strict circumstances &#8211; under Judicial allowance or after being convicted of serious offences (rape, murder and some other). The Government wishes to change that so the police will have the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The governments proposed <a href="http://www.legislation.govt.nz/bill/government/2009/0014-1/latest/DLM1829219.html">amendments to the Criminal Investigations Act</a> are, quite simply, chilling.</p>
<p>The police already have powers to store your DNA but under very strict circumstances &#8211; under Judicial allowance or after being <em>convicted</em> of serious offences (rape, murder and some other). The Government wishes to change that so the police will have the authority to extract and store your DNA for simply being suspected of a crime.</p>
<p>This idea is at ends with the New Zealand Bill Of Rights Act (BORA). The governments Attorney General, Chris Finlayson, has <a href='http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&#038;objectid=10556095'>reported back</a> to the government this fact and it&#8217;s looking like it&#8217;s going to be ignored, and National will ram through more legislation under urgency totally bypassing the select committee submission process once again.</p>
<p>This is ridiculously scary stuff. Especially since similar movements to allow police fishing expedition in the UK are now under investigation for breaching the European Bill of Rights.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nevermind.co.nz/2009/02/11/goodbye-nanny-state-hello-big-brother/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Piracy in the Theaters</title>
		<link>http://www.nevermind.co.nz/2008/05/29/piracy-in-the-theaters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nevermind.co.nz/2008/05/29/piracy-in-the-theaters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 22:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nevermind.co.nz/2008/05/29/piracy-in-the-theaters/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[photo credit: EricGjerde The movie industry (and music industry as well) have recently become obsessed with filthy, freeloading, artist-livelihood-destroying, rum-drinking, organised crime-funding internet pirates. These enemies of freedom sail the seven ISP&#8217;s cutting profits of the honest middlemen with their cutlasses. An interesting thing popped up today with regards to movie studios trying to discourage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left;margin:10px"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/44315708@N00/1405029875/" title="" target="_blank"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1391/1405029875_e1532c3945_m.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a><br /><small><a href="http://www.photodropper.com/creative-commons/" title="creative commons" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.nevermind.co.nz/wp-content/plugins/photo_dropper/images/cc.png" alt="Creative Commons License" border="0" width="16" height="16" align="absmiddle" /></a> <a href="http://www.photodropper.com/photos/" target="_blank">photo</a> credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/44315708@N00/1405029875/" title="EricGjerde" target="_blank">EricGjerde</a></small></div>
<p>The movie industry (and music industry as well) have recently become obsessed with filthy, freeloading, artist-livelihood-destroying, rum-drinking, organised crime-funding internet pirates. These enemies of freedom sail the seven ISP&#8217;s cutting profits of the honest middlemen with their cutlasses.</p>
<p>An interesting thing popped up today with regards to movie studios trying to discourage pirates. It seems that they are trying out a method to watermark the films &#8211; because this idea to make the film undesirable to copyright infringes is quite simply ridiculous for some very obvious reasons&#8230;</p>
<p>Their <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/05/28/paramount-silencing.html">brilliant idea was this</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Paramount has intentionally silenced bits of the soundtrack of &#8220;Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull&#8221; in order to deter and track piracy.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Deter piracy with a few gaps in the soundtrack? Have any of these people actually seen what a movie looks and sounds like recorded by a consumer-level camera in the theaters? You&#8217;d be lucky if the only thing wrong was a few gaps in the soundtrack! People that are willing to watch a movie recorded by a hand held camera in a theater are simply not going to be bothered by this &#8211; they already put up with coughs, splutters, shhush&#8217;s, hairdos, moving people and a camera man who appears to be afflicted with Parkinson&#8217;s disease. In fact, the only people that it&#8217;s going to upset are the poor suckers that just paid $15 to watch your crippled movie in the theater.</p>
<p>Seriously bad idea. My idea would be to throw an infrared floodlight against the theater screen. Invisible to the human eye but you can be sure the camera&#8217;s CCD will pick it up <img src='http://www.nevermind.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In other copyright news it seems the New Zealand Government has been invited to discussions regarding ACTA, the Anti-Counterfiting Trade Agreement. This treaty, in negotiation with UK, US and Canada, has been drawn up in secret and has only just come to light. You can read the discussion paper <a href="http://wikileaks.org/wiki/G-8_plurilateral_intellectual_property_trade_agreement_discussion_paper">here </a>and it seems to be just a thinly veiled assault on privacy in the name of Intellectual Property Rights protection.</p>
<p>I can only hope the New Zealand government is not involved with this, as the paper is full of very scary provisions&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>â€œCooperationâ€ is the â€œkey componentâ€ to ACTA, which means governments agree to exchange information with each other about their citizens in order to protect the IPR industry (although the data exchange wonâ€™t be limited to that goal)</p></blockquote>
<p>The big problem I have with this is the fact it was negotiated completely in secret with no transparency. It&#8217;s also misleading all the way up to the title. Since when did counterfeiting have anything to do with Intellectual Property Rights (<a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/not-ipr.html">I hate that saying&#8230;</a>)? It seems what they can&#8217;t put into international law they enforce in trade treaties. For instance an FTA with the USA is almost always conditional on adopting their broken patent system and their draconian DMCA-like laws. Copyright enforcement should be a purely civil matter, not criminal.</p>
<p>This is seriously bad news and can spell major issues for both consumers and other parties such as ISPs and public services should they have to comply. I hope NZ doesn&#8217;t touch it with a 10-foot barge pole.</p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080602-the-real-acta-threat-its-not-ipod-scanning-border-guards.html">Ars Technica</a> has a very well written analysis of the problems to be had with ACTA. Go Ars!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nevermind.co.nz/2008/05/29/piracy-in-the-theaters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

